Hats off to Morgan Stanley and Matthew Robson. With more than 90% of all coverage about teenagers and youth negative, it’s refreshing to see a global firm put a very young, smart intern front and centre. Well done. My company was born the same year as Matthew and we have spent the better part of the past fifteen years decoding young people in various parts of the world. We recently completed a study of 1000 British young people attitudes toward media and the Internet. Based on this knowledge I would like to offer these eight additional points of context to Mr. Robson’s excellent report.
1. The concept of understanding ‘teenagers’ from is flawed the start. 13-19 year olds as a group cross over a few levels of schooling and as most 13 and 19 year olds will tell you there is a big gap in life experience. Key transitions like driving, legal drinking, jobs and voting often split this group into at least two realities. Each transition has an impact on media behavior.
2. Don’t underestimate the significance gender plays at this stage of life. Years ago Calvin Klein launched CK1 cologne to meet the growing trend of androgyny among young people. The pendulum has definitely swung back especially in media use.
3. Advertising does work. It just has to be thoughtful, disruptive (usually means funny, but not always) and well positioned. Rarely do advertisers get all three of these right, so the generation born with the remote finds it natural to look for a better option. Young people have always been skeptical towards advertising, because they are the group most often manipulated.
4. Bravo BBC. You are proof that traditional brands can learn new tricks. Public networks worldwide take note. The iPlayer was a brilliant move to bring in the next generation on their terms. It also positioned the BBC second, just behind Google in DECODE’s youth brand rankings in the UK.
5. “Free for all” is certainly a youth rallying cry. To some degree it always has been, but now it’s more the expected norm. Perception and reality are worth noting. Bolt-ons, surprises, access, are a starting point not a value added service. Television and the Internet are rarely free. Someone else pays for it. Even free wi-fi at McDonalds comes with a side of chips.
6. I don’t believe the DJ is dead. They filter content for the masses and alleviate the tyranny of choice that many young people face.
7. Newspapers aren’t dead yet either, but they should hire more DJs. Last year at a global conference of newspaper execs hosted by the World Association of Newspapers, I revealed that young people feel TV is a more credible news source than newspapers. This was part of a study on youth news media trends called Youth Media DNA. The fact is young people probably consume a lot of newspaper content without knowing it. Newspapers need to create their own version of the BBC iPlayer (I don’t mean a video player specifically) to show young people what value they get from newspaper content. Oh, and they need to provide it free for a while, change editorial to focus on issues that are more interesting to young people, use parents as allies and build relevant relationships with schools. I’m just getting started.
8. The size of youth social networks may be overblown. Most people are surprised at how few online friends young people have. On average teenagers have 90 online friends. But while that seems low to some, it is also a bit misleading. More than half of teenagers have less than 20 online friends - meaning that while a minority have tonnes of friends, most have a few.
All fuller response to the original Morgan Stanley report written by DECODE intern Ben Doherty is available for download here.
Robert Barnard Attitudes, Consumer, Generation Y, Online Engagement, Social Networking, Students, Young Employees, Youth Trends Britain, DJ, media, Newspapers, social networks, teenager, twitter, UK